Peer2Politics
135.7K views | +1 today
Follow
Peer2Politics
on peer-to-peer dynamics in politics, the economy and organizations
Curated by jean lievens
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

All power to the {historical} imagination! McKenzie Wark on Karatani | P2P Foundation

Kojin Karatani’s The Structure of World History is an astonishing work of synthetic historical theory: world history is the history of modes of exchange.
No comment yet.
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

Why the P2P and Commons Movement Must Act Trans-Locally and Trans-Nationally - P2P Foundation

Why the P2P and Commons Movement Must Act Trans-Locally and Trans-Nationally - P2P Foundation | Peer2Politics | Scoop.it

Karatini focuses on world history as an evolution of ‘modes of exchange’, i.e. how humans produce, but most of all, ‘exchange’ value. Like Alan Page Fiske, in ‘Structures of Social Life’, Karatini recognizes four basic ways of doing this, and these modes exist at all times and in all places. For example, while the dominance of capitalism is new, markets have existed since very early times; or, if the dominance of the state was new after the replacement of tribal systems, distribution depending on rank pre-existed its dominance. This insight is very important because it allows us to recognize that any political and economic system is not just one modality, but an integration of modalities. As Dmytri Kleiner says, ‘we live in a multi-modal world’, and ‘if the capitalists won, its because there were capitalists already’

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by jean lievens
Scoop.it!

Why the P2P and Commons Movement Must Act Trans-Locally and Trans-Nationally

Why the P2P and Commons Movement Must Act Trans-Locally and Trans-Nationally | Peer2Politics | Scoop.it

Karatini focuses on world history as an evolution of ‘modes of exchange’, i.e. how humans produce, but most of all, ‘exchange’ value. Like Alan Page Fiske, in ‘Structures of Social Life’, Karatini recognizes four basic ways of doing this, and these modes exist at all times and in all places. For example, while the dominance of capitalism is new, markets have existed since very early times; or, if the dominance of the state was new after the replacement of tribal systems, distribution depending on rank pre-existed its dominance. This insight is very important because it allows us to recognize that any political and economic system is not just one modality, but an integration of modalities. As Dmytri Kleiner says, ‘we live in a multi-modal world’, and ‘if the capitalists won, its because there were capitalists already’.

No comment yet.